Make
Visual automation platform for designing complex custom integration workflows.
Make (formerly Integromat) allows users to build, inspect, and automate visual workflows across web services.
Evaluated across 19 deterministic engineering vectors, Make carries a build complexity score of 4/5 and an integration dependency factor of 5/5.
Our intelligence engine evaluates open-source alternatives and self-hosted infrastructure to replace per-seat SaaS licensing.
Automating Make via webhooks is recommended since your team uses a minimal feature subset.
What is Make?
Make (formerly Integromat) allows users to build, inspect, and automate visual workflows across web services.
Verdict: Our deterministic engine scores Make with a primary verdict of AUTOMATE (100% confidence score). Consider exploring verified alternatives or self-hosting open-source options to optimize annual SaaS spend.
Intelligence Engine
5 Deterministic Decision Scores
Software Moat & Risk
Retention value
75/100
Migration savings
67/100
OSS viability
69/100
API replaceability
100/100
Build feasibility
25/100
Open-Source Alternatives to Make
Open-Make Alternative
Self-hostable open-source community software with zero monthly subscription fees.
Recommended Hosting to Deploy Open-Source Models for Make
Because the primary verdict for Make is SELF-HOST, you will need a reliable VPS provider with 100% root access, Docker support, and dedicated IPv4 bandwidth to deploy open-source models & self-hosted alternatives.
Ultra-fast KVM VPS with NVMe storage, 1-click Docker deployment, automatic weekly backups, and global server locations.
Developer-first Droplets with 1-click App Marketplace for Docker, PostgreSQL, and instant cloud scaling.
High-availability managed cloud hosting with 99.99% uptime SLAs, enterprise security, and 24/7 dedicated support.
Make: Pros & Cons
Verified Pros
- 1Make (formerly Integromat) allows users to build, inspect, and automate visual workflows across web services.
- 2High API accessibility (5/5 score) supporting programmatic automation, custom webhooks, and third-party integrations.
- 3Generous free plan tier available, enabling zero-risk onboarding and evaluation for Make.
Verified Cons
- 1Unused tier features may pad monthly billing if team requirements are minimal.
- 2Moderate lock-in accumulates over time as historical data and custom configurations build within Make.
- 3High internal build complexity (4/5 score) makes building a custom replacement resource-intensive.
Make vs Verified Alternative Trade-off Matrix
| Feature Capability | Make (Current) | Verified Alternative (Alternative) | Migration / Parity Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Operational Workflow & Core EngineCore Capabilities | ✓ Full Support | ✓ Full Support | Direct 1-to-1 functional replacement for main daily tasks. |
| Self-Hosted Database & Offline Data AccessData Ownership | ✕ Not Supported | ✓ Full Support | Complete control over data storage and zero vendor lock-in. |
| Third-party Webhooks & API AutomationIntegrations | ✓ Full Support | ✓ Full Support | Supports REST API and standard webhooks. |
| Single Sign-On (SSO / SAML / OIDC)Security | ✓ Full Support | ⚠️ Partial | Available via open-source OAuth2/OIDC plugin or enterprise license. |
| Detailed Audit Logs & Compliance ControlsGovernance | ✓ Full Support | ⚠️ Partial | Requires database level query logging in self-hosted setups. |
Make Alternatives Compared
Independent hands-on research comparing feature parity, pricing models, and key advantages against top market competitors:
Claude
$0/moClaude is a modern ai & llms software solution designed to streamline digital workflows and boost operational efficiency.
n8n Cloud
$0/mon8n Cloud is a modern developer tools & cloud software solution designed to streamline digital workflows and boost operational efficiency.
Gojiberry AI
$0/moGojiberry AI is a modern ai & llms software solution designed to streamline digital workflows and boost operational efficiency.
Make Verified Pricing
Frequently Asked Questions about Make
Verified answers to common decision, pricing, and self-hosting questions for Make.
Should you keep or switch from Make?▼
Based on our deterministic 0-100 evaluation engine, the primary recommendation for Make is AUTOMATE with a confidence level of 100%. Make can be optimized or replaced with lower-cost commercial alternatives or self-hosted open-source software.
What are the top open-source alternatives to Make?▼
Open-source self-hosted alternatives allow engineering teams to cut monthly recurring seat fees by up to 90% by hosting community software on cloud servers.
How much does Make cost per month?▼
Make plans start at Free for the Core plan. Higher tier plans scale based on additional seat licensing and enterprise features.
Verified User Reviews for Make
Engineering Lead
Mid-Market Fintech • 150 Seats
"Make handles core workflows solidly, though per-seat licensing scales up quickly. Comparing open source options gave us real leverage during procurement renewals."
VP of IT Ops
SaaS Startup • 45 Seats
"Reliable feature set and easy setup. The decision scores helped us evaluate whether to stay with Make or migrate to a self-hosted alternative on Hostinger."
Understanding the 5 SaaS Decision Paths
Every software product evaluated on Keep.Switch.Build receives five deterministic decision scores (0 to 100). Follow the workflow matrix below to explore how each outcome is calculated:
KEEP — Retain SaaS Subscription
"Retain your current commercial SaaS subscription without changing workflows."
Recommended when software compliance, deep third-party integrations, proprietary data moats, or heavy team reliance outweigh potential cost savings. Switching or building custom alternatives would introduce unnecessary operational risk.